Weight loss jabs – Eng>Eng exercises

In this post, I’m using a speech about GLP-1 weight loss drugs as the basis for a few English enhancement exercises.

Here’s the speech. You could start by doing an English>English consecutive, or a simultaneous reformulation exercise (English>English), the idea being to keep key terms that can’t be changed (such as ‘GLP-1s’), but look for alternative constructions, synonyms, or different idioms where possible – without changing the register or message of the original speech.

1. Collocation & Register Check

Complete the following collocations based on the themes in the speech:

  1. To exert _________ (the traditional view of weight loss).
  2. A two-tier _________ (the divide between private and public access).
  3. Vested _________ (why food companies are suddenly interested in health).
  4. Chronic _________ (the clinical definition used to justify the drug).

2. Lexical Expansion: Sophisticated Synonyms

What alternatives can you come up with for the words in bold? Do they have the same register as the original? Feel free to change the sentence structure a little.

  1. The food industry is trying to fix its image by offering “GLP-1 companion” products.
  2. Obesity can ruin the quality of life of those with chronic conditions.
  3. Companies are acting like opportunists in the face of this medical trend.

3. Speaking task

Scenario: You are participating in a high-level panel discussion at a health summit. Choose the right register for your role! Don’t forget to record your performance.

  • Role A (The Bio-Ethicist): argue that medicalising obesity via GLP-1s risks “pathologising” the human body and ignores environmental factors (the “obesogenic environment”).
  • Role B (The Pharma Spokesperson): argue that the “willpower” narrative is a vestige of Victorian morality and an ineffectual approach to the problem.
  • Role C (The ‘Victim’ of GLP-1s): argue that long-terms effects of taking GLP-1s are poorly understood, that the side-effects can be devastating, and that people such as yourself are spending your own money on illegal jabs that leave them with long-term health problems while lining the pockets of big pharma.

Here’s the sort of thing a quite formal speaker might say:

  • “Be that as it may…”
  • “The crux of the matter lies in…”
  • “At the risk of sounding pedantic…”
  • “There is a pervasive, albeit flawed, assumption that…”

Answer Key

2. Lexical Expansion (Suggested):

  1. Improve
  2. Compromise/affect/impact/blight the lives
  3. Mercenary (or perhaps predatory)

1. Collocations:

  1. To exert willpower.
  2. A two-tier healthcare system.
  3. Vested interests.
  4. Chronic disease/condition.

Leave a comment

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close